Overview
Learning Amount5.0/10
Would Recommend50%
Ratings
Lectures4.0/5
Readings3.5/5
Feedback1.5/5
Communication3.5/5
Common Tags
EngagingUnclear ExpectationsEasy GraderDisorganizedNone
PHIL 351
Taken Fall 2025 · Reviewed Jan 27, 2026
8/10
learning
Lectures4.0/5
Readings5.0/5
Feedback1.0/5
Communication2.0/5
Would retake: 4/5
Recommend: Yes
Good for non-majors? No
Teaching: Lecture, Full class discussion
Reading (pages/week): 6
Homework (hours/week): 3
Essays: 0
Exams: 2, not curved
FYSE 102
Taken Fall 2024 · Reviewed Jan 27, 2026
2/10
learning
Lectures4.0/5
Readings2.0/5
Feedback2.0/5
Communication5.0/5
Would retake: 3/5
Recommend: No
Good for non-majors? No
Teaching: Full class discussion
Reading (pages/week): 50
Homework (hours/week): 3
Essays: 1
Exams: 2, not curved
"Professor Shah was good at starting in-depth class discussions and class was always interesting. I wish he had lectured more and done less class discussion, as I feel like I finished the seminar not quite knowing what it was about. Also, he seemed to forget that this was an intro seminar and often strayed from the stated theme of the course--"progress". Assignment feedback was vague and his explanations of it were confusing. Assignments were sent out on weekends over email and the grading scale and criteria were not clear. However, Shah was a fairly generous grader. "
EngagingUnclear ExpectationsEasy GraderDisorganized